Genetic Enhancement, Autonomy, and Society

Prenatal and postnatal genetic enhancement mayhis discussion of early IVF techniques: "Since offspring
ultimately result in a post-human society. Thesewould have had no alternative route to a healthy
techniques remain in the science fiction realm for thebirth, embryo transfer... would not harm offspring,
foreseeable future, but a consideration of theirand therefore could not be banned on that basis."1
implications is critically important for our ability toThe child's autonomy would be affected by parents
successfully manage their impact.who attempt to limit their offspring's choices. But a
What might be good concerning geneticchild's autonomy is never that of an adult. A child's
enhancement and what might be not so good? Inchoices are always limited. A proportion of parents
the early going there would be questions ofwho choose genetic enhancement will be smart
distributive justice. As the procedures would beparents who have upgraded their child's opportunities
costly in the initial period of availability, the rich wouldand provide the space for their child to make her
get richer. One solution could involve governmentown choices (within the boundaries of being a child).
subsidies for those who are economicallyAnother group of parents will attempt to force
disadvantaged.choices upon their child. I assert this would occur
As a taxpayer, I'd resist such use of myregardless of the availability of genetic enhancement.
contributions to federal coffers. Possibly theSuch genetic manipulation could provide great value. I
government could subsidize a select number ofwould have enjoyed being able to run faster and
procedures for the entire population, and a lotteryjump higher. What if we could be able to breathe
would determine the lucky families. At least, thisunderwater? Such an enhancement would be greatly
would be a more equitable use of these newappreciated by many. What if we could read a
technologies.400-page book in an hour? I'd like to be able to do
I'll level the playing field and create a scenario in whichthat, too.
any family can afford genetic enhancement. Is theBut considering how much progress has been
autonomy of the enhanced child affected? On oneachieved in the last 50 years regarding the treatment
view, as this child is the one actually born, she canof cancer (literally zero), such genetic breakthroughs
have no complaints regarding autonomy, at least withare at least 100 years away. Regardless, a
respect to her enhanced genetic sequence. She'sforward-thinking society would have its ethical
alive, and this is only a bad thing in the extremelyconstructs in place in advance of the technology.
unlikely circumstance that her life is not worth living.1 Robertson JA: The new reproduction.
Similar views have been propounded by Robertson in