Genetic Screening As Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis - Increased IVF Success

An inability to establish or maintain pregnancy is mostimplantation can, with appropriate consent, be
often attributed to lethal genetic defects of thedonated for medical research. This would help to
embryo. For infertile couples and carriers of geneticalleviate the current lack of stem cells which are
disease, the option of in vitro fertilization (IVF) canneeded to develop future treatments for inherited
often offer the only viable alternative. Over the lastdisease.
15 years, advances in molecular genetics has allowedPGD has clear advantages but the process is not
for embryos to be genetically screened prior towithout limitations. Many studies indicate that it has
implantation. Employing various genetic techniqueslittle or no effect for mature (age 40+) women
such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR),trying to conceive. Also, since PCR and FISH usually
Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) andanalyze single cells, there is a possibility of false
Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), thispositive and false negative results - errors which are
process - known as preimplantation genetic diagnosisusually due to multiple cell lines in the early embryo
(PGD) - is now used to identify embryos with athrough disjunction at mitosis. Consequently, healthy
range of genetic abnormalities such as chromosomalembryos are occasionally discarded as aneuploidic
aneuploidy, single gene defects and X-lined disorders.before they have the opportunity to 'self-correct', a
This article will discuss some advantages andphenomenon known to occur in these so called
disadvantages of using this technology in IVF assisted'mosaic' embryos.
reproduction.Other limitations of PGD include failure to detect rare
The use of PGD ensures that only healthy embryostypes of polygenic disease, such as those of cystic
are implanted in the womb. This presents a numberfibrosis which has over 1000 known mutations. Even
of obvious advantages. Firstly, it substantiallythe basic cell extraction is in itself technically
increases the chance of successful pregnancy bychallenging. The embryo must be held in position by a
eliminating genetic factors which cause subsequentholding pipette, while the zona pellicuda is breached
miscarriage. It also avoids the trauma of multipleusing a micro-needle before a single cell can removed
terminations following unfavorable prenatal diagnosesby aspiration. This is a delicate process which poses a
- a reality that is all too common for couples withrisk of irreversible damage to the developing embryo
genetic disease. Ultimately, as well as diminishingand requires considerable training. Coupled with the
emotional and financial stress of repeated IVF cycles,fact that the process is expensive and therefore not
PGD ultimately prevents the birth of individuals withavailable to everyone, it is clear that there are also
genetic disease. These individuals would otherwisedisadvantages.
face a myriad of medical and social problems whichPGD may give couples with genetic disease the
would both reduce their quality of life and significantlyopportunity to produce healthy offspring but the
reduce their life expectancy.technologies have potential applications which society
The application of PGD to IVF presents othermay deem ethically questionable. For example, is it
favorable opportunities. Albeit controversial, embryosmorally or ethically sound to 'edit' which children
can be screened for histocompatibility to identify ashould be born into the world? Will genetically
match for a sick sibling. This can often be the bestaffected embryos always be used in the manner for
opportunity - or indeed the only opportunity - towhich consent is given? Should PGD be used for
save the life of the sibling with a terminal illness,non-medical reasons such as selection for desired
although this may often present ethical and moraltraits or gender? These are questions that society
considerations. Furthermore, embryos rejected formust surely address as this technology develops.