Genetics Tests Irrelevant to Life Insurance

When scientists started studying the genetics ofincentive not to insure someone at risk of
breast cancer, they hoped to understand theHuntington's Disease - a progressive neurological
mechanism by which the disease developed and sodisorder which can lead to many years in hospital. But
reveal new ways of treating it. They did not expectlife insurance provides cover against someone dying
to end up furthering the commercial interests ofduring the currency of the policy.
insurance companies.And, while some genetic tests may predict what you
Yet insurers in Britain have been taking account ofmay die of, they do not predict the timing of death.
the results of genetic tests for breast cancer inSo the tests are not relevant to life insurance, which
granting insurance cover, even though two separateis more important in Britain than healthcare insurance.
Government Commissions have recommended aSecondly, it is gradually becoming apparent that,
moratorium on the use of such information. Onlybecause of the rarity of the inherited forms of
after a public outcry has the Association of Britishbreast cancer, the numbers of cases involved are
Insurers accepted a voluntary, two-year ban on thetiny. It is inconceivable that an industry with an annual
use of genetic test results for policies overturnover of billions could be seriously threatened by
£300,000.their occurrence.
Insurers have a legitimate fear of 'adverse selection',The two genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) that have been
whereby a known 'bad risk' might take out a verylinked with breast cancer account for less than five
high insurance policy without disclosing their geneticper cent of all cases. Those who have one of the
status. In theory, if one company were unluckygenes are not certain to develop the disease and
enough to have several such clients, it couldcan, in any case, take steps to minimise their risk.
endanger the financial stability of the company.Why then do the insurers persist? One suggestion is
Insurers make their money by charging higherthat they are not really interested in the single-gene
premiums to anyone with a higher-than-average risk.disorders, like Huntington's and the few inherited
Genetic test results offer one way of stratifying thebreast cancers, but are laying down a marker for the
risks that the company insures against.future, when genetic susceptibility tests might be
But in my view the insurers are both overestimatingavailable for all the common diseases of the West.
the importance of genetics and learning the wrongIf there is even a glimmer of truth in this rather
lesson from experience in the USA. The results ofcynical view then the struggle to keep genetic test
genetic tests do matter in the US, where health careresults private is a matter of concern not just for
is backed by private insurance, but not in the UK,the small number of families affected by genetic
where health insurance is compulsory and universal.disease, but for everyone.
Private health insurance companies have a powerful