Paternity Testing Regulation: Help or Hindrance?

The French legislation has passed a law whichmarket, decreases competition, and drives up prices.
prohibits testing for paternity without theBusiness Perspective
involvement of the court system. Article 16-11 of thePro: DNA laboratories are able to sell a state utility
civil code states that in order for an individual toservice to virtually anyone through the postal service.
legally conduct a paternity test, he or she must firstThe margin on DNA tests is high, and free home kits
have a court-appointed lawyer assigned to his or hercan be sent across international borders at a very
unique case. The court then has control to decide thelow cost. French labs are much fewer than the
consequences of the paternity test results. Thisnumber of labs in other countries, and the likelihood
article will explore how one man’s red tape isof business being conducted outside France is quite
another man’s due process.high. Large international laboratories could predatorily
Introductionprice their tests to the point where conducting a
The internet has opened up opportunities for manyDNA test can no longer be done locally.
DNA laboratories to distribute free paternity test kitsDNA labs that are set up inside France will benefit
in hopes of a sale from returned samples. In Europe,from this legislation because French citizens are not
France is the only country that regulates howpermitted to conduct a test outside of the country.
paternity tests are conducted. Citizens of otherAlthough industry protection was not the reason for
European nations are free to satisfy their ownadding this article to the civil code, French labs
curiosities and nagging doubts, while French citizenscapture the entire national market for paternity
jump through hoops. Regulation and red tape protecttesting.
some while hindering others.Con: Article 16 almost creates a public sector for
Society Perspectivepaternity testing. The market size is reduced because
Pro: In 1941, the French government adopted a lawfewer people will be willing conduct a test because of
called “Accouchement Sous X,” or Childbirththe increased complexity. In other countries, such as
Under X. This law allows a French woman to enter athe UK and Germany, an individual can conduct a test
hospital anonymously by signing her name as an X.almost whimsically. Having this new technology
Her identity and her child’s identity are bothavailable to the general public at an affordable price
kept anonymous. For a mother who has given birthhas expanded the market size and allowed
anonymously, for whatever reason, a paternity testbusinesses to grow. In France, prices are relatively
would surely break the anonymity. Mothers seekingfixed. Consumers make choices based more on
refuge under the X law will undoubtedly seek thelocation than on price and quality.
same protection under Article 16.The legislation also creates an entry barrier for other
Alleged fathers will also benefit from this law becausecompanies to enter the French market. In order for a
assessing paternity usually means child supportlaboratory in the UK to compete in France, it would
payments. Years of due arrears may be charged toneed to expand operations and build inside the
an alleged father if it is found that he is the biologicalcountry. This infeasibility deters many businesses
father. Having a lawyer involved in the process forfrom expanding into France.
each case’s beginning will give greaterConclusion
credibility to the test and its results. The transitionTo some, red tape is an annoyance; to others, it is
from results to court decision is also smoothed anddue process. Although Article 16-11 forces French
hastened by having a court-appointed lawyer.citizens to undergo a more lengthy process when
Con: It’s hard to say just how many peopleconducting a paternity test and hinders business
have forgone a paternity test because of the redcompetition, the article serves the best interest of
tape involved. The majority of single mothers are in athe people. To make this legislation less burdensome,
less-than-favorable financial condition and probablythe court-appointed lawyer should be paid for by the
can’t afford to hire a lawyer.state. This will allow more citizens to find the answers
Placing restriction on business operations shrinks theto their family-relation questions.