Real Medical Research on the HCG Weight Loss Diet

The Original Research by Dr. A.T.W. Simeons1973 Study
The research by Dr. Simeons was published in 1954 inThis study was published 10 years later, also in the
his book, 'Pounds and Inches', which is widely availableAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition (vol. 26, pp.
at no cost on many websites. He designed his211-218, 1963). The researchers who conducted it, at
protocol to be very precise regarding the amount ofthe American Society of Bariatric Physicians Research
HCG required for injection, for the number of caloriesCouncil, studied about twice as many subjects as the
and the types foods allowed, and for the optimal1963 study above. The final result was an average
duration of the program. He also published a briefloss of 19.96 pounds in the HCG group and 11.05
synopsis of his program in the British medical journalpounds in the control group. More importantly, the
Lancet (vol. 2, pp. 946-947, 1954).statistical analysis supported this difference as being
This weight loss program has attracted considerablesignificant. The conclusion of this study was that HCG
attention from the medical community and fromdid cause weight loss.
people who have undergone treatment. Its popularity1995 Meta Analysis
is one reason why so many people, including medicalMeta analysis refers to a comparison of multiple
doctors, have decided to offer opinions on whether itstudies on the same topic. This meta analysis was
works. The success of HCG for weight loss has beenpublished in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
so great that it has attracted negative attention(vol. 40, pp. 237-243, 1995) by researchers at Vrije
from the FDA.University, Netherlands. They evaluated 16 studies
Before I go further, I want to note that the FDA isand observed that most of them were of 'poor
not an agency that serves human health. It is anmethodological quality' (meaning, bad science). Only
agency that serves the financial interests ofone of the 12 articles of acceptable quality showed
pharmaceutical companies. Negative attention froman effect on weight loss by HCG. The researchers
the FDA almost always means that the healthconcluded that 'there is no scientific evidence that
benefits of the treatment in question mightHCG is effective in the treatment of obesity'.
undermine drug profits. Indeed, seeing the statementMeta analysis studies have become very popular in
that HCG is not approved by the FDA for weightmedicine because of the notion that a trend over
loss is, in my opinion, support for the effectivenessmultiple studies shows the truth. Unfortunately, the
of this protocol.basic rules of statistics invalidate any such
Medical Studiescomparisons. Moreover, when even one study stands
The government's PubMed database lists more thanout against the majority, it is wrong to ignore it
18,000 journal articles on HCG, with less than a fewcompletely as these researchers have done. It would
dozen of these having anything to do with weightbe much more valuable to figure out why some
loss. Most of the research on this hormone involvesstudies give contradictory results to one another.
fertility, pregnancy, and the detection of cancerousThis meta analysis also reveals what I call the dirty
tumors. What I want to do is call your attention tolaundry of medical science - i.e., most research is so
just three studies as examples of the confusion thatflawed that it is almost useless for saying anything at
is rampant in the medical literature on HCG andall with certainty. In fact, this is kind of a scary
weight loss.thought, isn't it?
1963 StudyTake Home Lesson
This study was published in the American Journal ofHuman subject research is the most difficult kind of
Clinical Nutrition (vol. 12, pp. 230-234, 1963), at thestudy because of so many variables that are out of
height of popularity of the HCG diet plan in the U.S. Inthe control of the experimental design. Determining
my reading of this article, it looks to me as thoughcause and effect is almost impossible. Nevertheless,
the researchers behind this study, from thewe can see from some research that HCG can and
University of California, San Francisco, School ofdoes drive weight loss. My view is that studies that
Medicine, followed the Simeons protocol to the letter.show this result are better in terms of sticking more
There was one exception: the consumption of aclosely to the Simeons protocol in the experimental
baked potato each day, which is not on Simeons' listdesign, then having the study subjects adhere closely
of allowed vegetables. The main result of the studyto it.
was an average loss of 6.5 pounds in theWhat I conclude regarding HCG and weight loss is
HCG-treated group, compared with an average lossbased on what I have seen for myself. This includes
of 8.8 pounds in the untreated (control) group. Themany, many people who have had the same results
authors concluded that the hormone did not causethat Simeons documented based on his clinical
weight loss.experience with thousands of patients. I have also
This study is remarkable for a couple reasons. One ishad the same results for myself. There is nothing like
that, in spite of following the Simeons protocol for 40personal experience! The key to my experience,
days, neither the treatment group nor the controlhowever, was monitoring my body fat composition.
group came close to the amount of weight loss thatWeight loss is almost irrelevant by itself. My result
is expected. A starvation diet alone (i.e., 550 calorieswas a reduction of 20 pounds AND of 6% body fat
per day) should have caused more weight loss thanin less than 30 days. Reduction in body fat is
reported. In fact, one subject on HCG even gainedsupposed to be the main effect of HCG.
weight. The other reason that this study isMedical researchers are apparently going to argue the
remarkable is that the number of study subjects (i.e.,merits of HCG and weight loss until the end of time,
10 in the treatment group, 9 in the control group)citing whichever research results support their
and the variability of the results within each grouparguments. As a scientist myself, I have no doubt
provided insufficient statistical power to explainwhatsoever that Simeons was right and that my
anything at all! Indeed, this study offered nobody changes occurred because of HCG.
comparative statistical analysis of weight loss. InOne More Thing
other words, the results did not support anyEarly studies on lab animals are now beginning to
conclusions whatsoever.show that HCG interacts with the hormone leptin.
Nevertheless, one or more factors are not obvious inLeptin is the new master fat hormone that has been
this study. Generally when a study has suchknown only since 1994. Like HCG, leptin also carries a
insignificant results, the subjects were not compliant -signal to the hypothalamus. I predict that the more
i.e., they did not follow the protocol very well. Thewe find out about the interaction between these
researchers offered no comment on this possibility,two hormones, the more we will understand how
so we will never know why both the treatmentingenious the Simeons protocol really is.
group and the control group underperformed.