Reproductive Cloning - Counter-Arguments Based on Rights of the Clone

Proposals in favor of reproductive cloning (RC) createOther parents may be focused on a particular trait.
immediate controversy. Passionate proponents andThey want to have a child who could become a
equally passionate opponents can be found in anyprofessional athlete, a rich Wall Street banker, or a
Starbucks, every state capitol, and the halls offamous movie star. They're willing to pay for the
Congress. Opponents are concerned with theright to create a clone using the DNA of such a
possibility of treating children who are the productsluminary.
of cloning as means to various ends, rather thanIn these situations the resulting child is treated as a
treating them as ends in themselves. Opponents aremeans to an end. In Groundwork of the Metaphysics
also concerned that these children, even if they areof Morals, the German philosopher Immanuel Kant
treated with full respect and as ends in themselves,famously stated "So act that you use humanity...
will not have opportunities to have fully "openalways at the same time as an end, never merely as
futures".1a means".2 Our moral status as persons implies we
Prospective parents may want to use reproductiveare ends, in and of ourselves. We have a duty to
cloning as a method to address infertility. For theserespect the individuality of another and not use
potential parents, RC would be an additional form ofanother solely as a means. Parents who try to create
assisted reproductive technology. But others maya replica of an already existing child or create a clone
wish to produce a child by cloning for reasons thatof a famous or wealthy person violate the
address their own selfish needs and desires. In suchpersonhood and moral status of the child who is
cases the future child's welfare and interests arecreated.
afterthoughts, at best.Even though its intended use is to help infertile
For example, parents may wish to use the cloningcouples have children, opponents of reproductive
process to create a child who is a replica of one ofcloning are concerned that legalization of the process
their current children. The living child may be talented,will lead to abuse by unscrupulous potential parents.
beautiful, and intelligent and the parents want to1Feinberg J: The child's right to an open future. In
ensure their next child will be exactly like the oneFeinberg J: Freedom and Fulfillment. Princeton, NJ,
they already have. The parents don't want to roll thePrinceton University Press, 1992, 76-97
genetic dice. They want to control the reproductive2 Wood AW: Kant.
process and, so they think, guarantee the outcome.