The Myth of Bird Evolution

Recently, a 140-million-year-old fossil calledby numerous, successive, slight, modifications, my
Shenzhouraptor sinensis was discovered in the Yixiantheory would absolutely break down." (10)
region of China. According to the evolutionaryBird Feathers and Reptile Scales
paleontologist Ji Qiang, this fossil was a missing linkAnother impassable gap between birds and reptiles is
between dinosaurs and birds. The fact is, however,feathers, which are peculiar to birds. Reptile bodies
that this fossil possesses features that clash with theare covered with scales, a completely different
evolutionists' claims about the origin of birds. Not juststructure. The hypothesis that bird feathers evolved
this fossil, but also the whole body of paleontologicalfrom reptile scales is completely unfounded, and is
data on the subject is at odds with the evolutionaryindeed disproved by the fossil record, as the
theory. "The evolution of birds", like other claimsevolutionist paleontologist Barbara Stahl once
made by Darwinism, is no more scientific than a fairyadmitted:
tale.How [feathers] arose initially, presumably from
Shenzhouraptor sinensis, The Impossible Transitionalreptiles scales, defies analysis... It seems, from the
Formcomplex construction of feathers, that their evolution
Evolutionists suggest that Shenzhouraptor sinensisfrom reptilian scales would have required an immense
was a transitional form that was able to fly andperiod of time and involved a series of intermediate
possessed both bird and dinosaur characteristics. Thisstructures. So far, the fossil record does not bear
is, however, is in contradiction to other evolutionistout that supposition. (11)
claims on the origin of birds.A. H. Brush, a professor of physiology and
Archaeopteryx, the oldest known bird, lived 150neurobiology at the University of Connecticut,
million years ago and is in many respects no differentaccepts this fact, although he is himself an
from flying birds living today. Shenzhouraptor sinensis,evolutionist: "Every feature from gene structure and
however, lived 140 million years ago, making itorganization, to development, morphogenesis and
younger than Archaeopteryx. For that reason, it istissue organization is different [in feathers and
impossible for it to be a transitional form, becausescales]." (12) Moreover, Professor Brush examines the
birds with perfect feathers and the necessaryprotein structure of bird feathers and argues that it is
anatomical structure for flight were living before it."unique among vertebrates." (13)
Archaeopteryx: Recent work shows it to beThere is no fossil evidence to prove that bird
"much more birdlike than previously imagined".feathers evolved from reptile scales. On the contrary,
At this point, we need to make it clear that thefeathers appear suddenly in the fossil record,
evolutionist claims regarding Archaeopteryx, on ofProfessor Brush observes, as an "undeniably unique"
the principle icons of the theory of evolution for thecharacter distinguishing birds. (14) Besides, in reptiles,
last 100 years or so, have lost a great deal of theirno epidermal tissue has yet been detected that
validity. It has been realized that this creature was aprovides a starting point for bird feathers. (15)
flying bird, possessing a flawless flight mechanism.Many fossils have so far been the subject of
Attempts to compare Archaeopteryx to a reptile"feathered dinosaur" speculation, but detailed study
have failed entirely.has always disproved it. Alan Feduccia once wrote
As Alan Feduccia, one of the leading ornithologists inthe following in an article called "On Why Dinosaurs
the world, has stated, "Most recent workers whoLacked Feathers":
have studied various anatomical features ofFeathers are features unique to birds, and there are
Archaeopteryx have found the creature to be muchno known intermediate structures between reptilian
more birdlike than previously imagined," and "thescales and feathers. Notwithstanding speculations on
resemblance of Archaeopteryx to theropod dinosaursthe nature of the elongated scales found on such
has been grossly overestimated." (1)forms as Longisquama (discovered 1969 Russia) ... as
Another problem regarding Archaeopteryx is that thebeing featherlike structures, there is simply no
theropod dinosaurs, which many evolutionists suggestdemonstrable evidence that they in fact are. (16)
were Archaeopteryx' ancestors, actually emergeMore recently, Feduccia, quoting Brush, has the
after it in the fossil record, not before it. This, offollowing passage on the origin of feathers:
course, leaves no room for any "evolutionary familyEven birds' most scalelike features-the leg scutes
tree" to account for the origin of birds.(scales), claws, and the epidermally derived beak-are
The Squabbling Evolutionistsformed from a single category of protein, the
The reason for the "dino-bird" and "feathered-keratins. As Alan Brush has written regarding feather
dinosaur" stories that frequently appear in thedevelopment, "The genes that direct synthesis of
evolutionist press is simply an effort on their part tothe avian -keratins represent a significant divergence
show that their claim that birds evolved fromfrom those of their reptilian ancestor."(17) (Note that
dinosaurs has been proven by fossil discoveries. Thethe authors assume a reptilian ancestor for birds, but
fact is, however, that none of these fossils hasaccept the genetic gap between these.)
offered any scientific evidence at all for that claim.National Geographic's great hit, the perfect "dino-bird"
What is more, many evolutionists do not believe itArchaeoraptor soon turned out to be a hoax. All
either. For instance, renowned ornithologists Alanother "dino-bird" candidates remain as speculation.
Feduccia and Larry Martin believe that it is totally anAll news about "dino-birds" is speculative. Many claims
erroneous scenario. A college textbook,on the subject have turned out to false. For
Developmental Biology reads:example, the "feathered dinosaur" claim that was put
Not all biologists believe that birds are dinosaurs... Thisforward in 1996 with a great media fanfare was also
group of scientists emphasize the differencesdisproved soon. A reptilian fossil called
between dinosaurs and birds, claiming that theSinosauropteryx was found in China, but
differences are too great for the birds to havepaleontologists who examined the fossil said that it
evolved from earlier dinosaurs. Alan Feduccia, andhad bird feathers, unlike modern reptiles. Examinations
Larry Martin, for instance, contend that birds couldconducted one year later, however, showed that the
not have evolved from any known group offossil actually had no structure similar to a bird's
dinosaurs. They argue against some of the mostfeather. (18)
important cladistic data and support their claim fromEvery other fossil that has been put forward as
developmental biology and biomechanics. (2)"feathered dinosaur" in the last 10 years is debatable.
Feduccia has this to say regarding the thesis ofDetailed studies have revealed that the structures
reptile-bird evolution:suggested to have been "feathers" are actually
Well, I've studied bird skulls for 25 years and I don'tcollagen fibers.(19) The speculations in fact stems
see any similarities whatsoever. I just don't see it...from evolutionist prejudice and wishful thinking. As
The theropod origins of birds, in my opinion, will beFeduccia says, "Many dinosaurs have been portrayed
the greatest embarrassment of paleontology of thewith a coating of aerodynamic contour feathers with
20th century. (3)absolutely no documentation."(20) (One of the
Larry Martin, a specialist in ancient birds from the"feathered dinosaurs" in question, namely
University of Kansas, also opposes the theory thatArchaeoraptor, proved to be a fossil forgery).
birds are descended from dinosaurs. Discussing theFeduccia sums the position up in these terms: "Finally,
contradiction that evolution falls into on the subject,no feathered dinosaur has ever been found, although
he states:many dinosaur mummies with well-preserved skin are
To tell you the truth, if I had to support the dinosaurknown from diverse localities." (21)
origin of birds with those characters, I'd beThe Design of Feathers
embarrassed every time I had to get up and talkAnother problem for the evolutionists is the fact that
about it. (4)there is such a complex design in bird feathers that
The disagreement amongst evolutionists themselvesthe phenomenon can never be accounted for
stems from the fact that there is no evidencewithout referring to intelligent design. As we all know,
supporting an evolutionary origin for birds. They canthere is a long, stiff part that runs up the center of
only build up speculations, just-so stories which arethe feather. Attached to the shaft are the vanes.
imposed on the public, misleadingly, as "scientificThe vane is made up of small thread-like strands,
theories".called barbs. These barbs, of different lengths and
The Significant Structural Differences Between Birdsrigidity, are what give the flying bird its aerodynamic
And Dinosaursnature. But what is even more interesting is that
Most evolutionists hold that birds evolved from smalleach barb has thousands of even smaller strands
theropod dinosaurs. However, a comparison betweenattached to them called barbules. The barbules are
birds and such reptiles reveals that the two haveconnected to barbicels, with tiny microscopic hooks,
very distinct features, making it unlikely that onecalled hamuli. Each strand is hooked to an opposing
evolved from the other.strand, much like the hooks of a zipper.
There are various structural differences betweenOn just one crane feather, there are up to 650 hairs
birds and reptiles, one of which concerns boneon the central tube. Each one of these is covered
structure. Due to their bulky natures, dinosaurs-thewith some 650 tinier hairs. And these tiny hairs are
ancestors of birds according to evolutionists-hadlinked together by 350 hooks. The hooks come
thick, solid bones. Birds, in contrast, whether living ortogether like the two sides of a zipper. If the hooks
extinct, have hollow bones that are very light, ascome apart for any reason, it is sufficient for the bird
they must be in order for flight to take place.to shake itself, or, in more serious cases, to
Another difference between reptiles and birds is theirstraighten its feathers out with its beak, for the
metabolic structure. Reptiles have the slowestfeathers to return to their previous positions.
metabolic structure in the animal kingdom. (The claimTo claim that the complex design in feathers could
that dinosaurs had a warm-blooded fast metabolismhave come about by the evolution of reptile scales
remains a speculation.) Birds, on the other hand, arethrough chance mutations is quite simply a dogmatic
at the opposite end of the metabolic spectrum. Forbelief with no scientific foundation. Even one of the
instance, the body temperature of a sparrow candoyens of Darwinism, Ernst Mayr, made this
rise to as much as 48°C (118°F) due to its fastconfession on the subject some years ago:
metabolism. On the other hand, reptiles lack the abilityIt is a considerable strain on one's credulity to
to regulate their body temperature. Instead, theyassume that finely balanced systems such as certain
expose their bodies to sunlight in order to warm up.sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird's
Put simply, reptiles consume the least energy of allfeather) could be improved by random mutations.
animals and birds the most.(22)
Yet, despite all the scientific findings, the groundlessThe design of feathers also compelled Darwin to
scenario of "dinosaur-bird evolution" is still insistentlyponder them. Moreover, the perfect aesthetics of
advocated. Popular publications are particularly fond ofthe peacock's feathers had made him "sick" (his own
the scenario. Meanwhile, concepts which provide nowords). In a letter he wrote to Asa Gray on April 3,
backing for the scenario are presented as evidence1860, he said, "I remember well the time when the
for "dinosaur-bird evolution."thought of the eye made me cold all over, but I
In some popular evolutionist publications, for instance,have got over this stage of complaint..." And then
emphasis is laid on the differences among dinosaurcontinued: "... and now trifling particulars of structure
hip bones to support the thesis that birds areoften make me very uncomfortable. The sight of a
descended from dinosaurs. These differences existfeather in a peacock's tail, whenever I gaze at it,
between dinosaurs classified as Saurischianmakes me sick!" (23)
(reptile-like, hip-girdled dinosaurs) and OrnithischianIn short, the enormous structural differences
(bird-like, hip-girdled dinosaurs). This concept ofbetween bird feathers and reptile scales, and the
dinosaurs having hip girdles similar to those of birds isastonishingly complex-and beautiful-design of
sometimes wrongly conceived as evidence for thefeathers, clearly demonstrate the invalidity of the
alleged dinosaur-bird link. However, the difference inclaim that feathers evolved from scales through blind
hip girdles is no evidence at all for the claim that birdsnatural mechanisms.
evolved from dinosaurs. That is because, surprisinglyConclusion
for the evolutionist, Ornithischian dinosaurs do notThe "dino-bird" stories that appear in the evolutionist
resemble birds with respect to other anatomicalpress consist of biased analyses by evolutionist
features. For instance, Ankylosaurus is a dinosaurpalaeontologists, and sometimes even of distortions
classified as Ornithischian, with short legs, a giantof the truth. (In fact, one of the best-known
body, and skin covered with scales resembling armor."dino-bird" discoveries, the Archaeoraptor portrayed
On the other hand, Struthiomimus, which resemblesby National Geographic as incontrovertible proof of
birds in some of its anatomical features (long legs,bird evolution, turned out to be a forgery produced
short forelegs, and thin structure), is actually aby combining fossils of five separate specimens). The
Saurischian. (5)"dino-bird" fossils in question are either those of
The Unique Structure of Avian Lungsextinct species of bird or of dinosaurs, and not one
Another factor demonstrating the impossibility of theof them represents a "missing link" between birds
reptile-bird evolution scenario is the structure of avianand dinosaurs. In fact, as we have seen above, it is
lungs, which cannot be accounted for by evolution.impossible for dinosaurs to have evolved into birds
Land-dwelling creatures have lungs with aand assumed bird characteristics by means of chance
two-directional flow structure. Upon inhaling, the airmutations.
travels through the passages in the lungs (bronchialThus the "dino-bird" hype that rages through the
tubes), ending in tiny air sacs (alveoli). The exchangemedia consists of nothing more than a last-ditch
of oxygen and carbon dioxide takes place here.attempt to shore up the collapsed theory of
Then, upon exhaling, this used air makes its wayevolution. However, science and reason will always
back and finds its way out of the lung by the sameprevail over such misconceptions.
route.LATEST EVIDENCE: OSTRICH STUDY REFUTES THE
In birds however, air follows just one directionDINO-BIRD STORY
through the lungs. The entry and exit orifices areDr. Feduccia: His new study is enough to bury the
completely different, and thanks to special air sacs all'dino-bird" myth.
along the passages between them, air always flowsThe latest blow to the "birds evolved from dinosaurs"
in one direction through the avian lung. In this way,theory came from a study made on the embryology
birds are able to take in air nonstop. This satisfiesof ostriches.
birds' high energy requirements. Michael Denton, anDrs. Alan Feduccia and Julie Nowicki of the University
Australian biochemist and a well-known critic ofof North Carolina at Chapel Hill studied a series of live
Darwinism, explains the avian lung in this way:ostrich eggs and, once again, concluded that, there
This one-directional flow of air is maintained incan not be an evolutionary link between birds and
breathing in and breathing out by a complex systemdinosaurs. EurekAlert, a scientific portal held by the
of interconnected air sacs in the bird's body, whichAmerican Association for the The Advancement of
expand and contract in such a way as to ensure aScience (AAAS), reports the following:
continuous delivery of air through the parabronchi…Drs. Alan Feduccia and Julie Nowicki of the University
The structure of the lung in birds, and the overallof North Carolina at Chapel Hill... opened a series of
functioning of the respiratory system, are quitelive ostrich eggs at various stages of development
unique. No lung in any other vertebrate species in anyand found what they believe is proof that birds could
way approaches the avian system. Moreover, in itsnot have descended from dinosaurs"...
essential details it is identical in birds. (6)Whatever the ancestor of birds was, it must have
The important thing is that the reptile lung, with itshad five fingers, not the three-fingered hand of
dual-direction air flow, could not have evolved intotheropod dinosaurs," Feduccia said... "Scientists agree
the bird lung with its single-direction flow, because it isthat dinosaurs developed 'hands' with digits one, two
not possible for there to have been an intermediateand three... Our studies of ostrich embryos, however,
model between them. In order for a living thing toshowed conclusively that in birds, only digits two,
live, it has to keep breathing, and a reversal of thethree and four, which correspond to the human
structure of its lungs with a change of design wouldindex, middle and ring fingers, develop, and we have
inevitably end in death. According to evolution, thispictures to prove it," said Feduccia, professor and
change must happen gradually over millions of years,former chair of biology at UNC. "This creates a new
whereas a creature whose lungs do not work will dieproblem for those who insist that dinosaurs were
within a few minutes.ancestors of modern birds. How can a bird hand, for
Michael Denton also states that it is impossible to giveexample, with digits two, three and four evolve from
an evolutionary account of the avian lung:a dinosaur hand that has only digits one, two and
…In the case of birds, however, the major bronchithree? That would be almost impossible." (i)
break down into tiny tubes which permeate the lungIn the same report, Dr. Freduccia also made
tissue. These so-called parabronchi eventually join upimportant comments on the invalidity-and the
together again, forming a true circulatory system soshallowness-of the "birds evolved from dinosaurs"
that air flows in one direction through the lungs. ...Justtheory:
how such an utterly different respiratory system"There are insurmountable problems with that
could have evolved gradually from the standardtheory," he [Dr. Feduccia] said. "Beyond what we
vertebrate design is fantastically difficult to envisage,have just reported, there is the time problem in that
especially bearing in mind that the maintenance ofsuperficially bird-like dinosaurs occurred some 25 million
respiratory function is absolutely vital to the life of anto 80 million years after the earliest known bird,
organism to the extent that the slightest malfunctionwhich is 150 million years old."
leads to death within minutes. Just as the featherIf one views a chicken skeleton and a dinosaur
cannot function as an organ of flight until the hooksskeleton through binoculars they appear similar, but
and barbules are co adapted to fit togetherclose and detailed examination reveals many
perfectly, so the avian lung cannot function as andifferences, Feduccia said. Theropod dinosaurs, for
organ of respiration until the parabronchi systemexample, had curved, serrated teeth, but the earliest
which permeates it and the air sac system whichbirds had straight, unserrated peg-like teeth. They
guarantees the parabronchi their air supply are bothalso had a different method of tooth implantation and
highly developed and able to function together in areplacement." (ii)
perfectly integrated manner. (7)This evidence once again reveals that the "dino-bird"
In brief, the passage from a terrestrial lung to anhype is just another "icon" of Darwinism: A myth that
avian lung is impossible, because an intermediate formis supported only for the sake of a dogmatic faith in
would serve no purpose.the theory.i - David Williamson, "Scientist Says Ostrich
Reptiles (and mammals) breathe in and out from theStudy Confirms Bird 'Hands' Unlike Those Of
same air vessel. In birds, while the air enters into theDinosaurs", EurekAlert, 14-Aug-2002, - David
lung from the front, it goes out from the back. ThisWilliamson, "Scientist Says Ostrich Study Confirms
distinct design is specially made for birds, which needBird 'Hands' Unlike Those Of Dinosaurs", EurekAlert,
great amounts of oxygen during flight. It is impossible14-Aug-2002,
for such a structure to evolve from the reptile lung.Under the pen name of Harun Yahya, Adnan Oktar
Another point that needs to be mentioned here ishas written some 250 works. His books contain a
that reptiles have a diaphragm-type respiratorytotal of 46,000 pages and 31,500 illustrations. Of
system, whereas birds have an abdominal air sacthese books, 7,000 pages and 6,000 illustrations deal
system instead of a diaphragm. These differentwith the collapse of the Theory of Evolution. You can
structures also make any evolution between the tworead, free of charge, all the books Adnan Oktar has
lung types impossible, as John Ruben from Oregonwritten under the pen name Harun Yahya on these
State University, an acknowledged authority in thewebsites
field of respiratory physiology, observes in the(1) Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds,
following passage:Yale University Press, 1999, p. 81
The earliest stages in the derivation of the avian(2) Scott F. Gilbert, "Did Birds Evolve from the
abdominal air sac system from a diaphragm-ventilatingDinosaurs?," Developmental Biology, Sixth Edition,
ancestor would have necessitated selection for achapter 16.4 (
diaphragmatic hernia in taxa transitional between(3) Pat Shipman, "Birds Do It... Did Dinosaurs?," New
theropods and birds. Such a debilitating conditionScientist, February 1, 1997, p. 28
would have immediately compromised the entire(4) Pat Shipman, "Birds Do It... Did Dinosaurs?," New
pulmonary ventilatory apparatus and seems unlikelyScientist, February 1, 1997, p. 28
to have been of any selective advantage. (8)(5) Duane T. Gish, Dinosaurs by Design, Master
Another interesting structural design of the avian lungBooks, AR, 1996. pp. 65-66
which defies evolution is the fact that it is never(6) Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis,
empty of air, and thus never in danger of collapse.London, Burnett Books Limited, 1985, p. 210-211.
Michael Denton explains the situation:(7) Michael Denton, A Theory in Crisis, Adler & Adler,
Just how such a different respiratory system could1986, pp. 210-212.
have evolved gradually from the standard vertebrate(8) J. A. Ruben, T. D. Jones, N. R. Geist, and W. J.
design without some sort of direction is, again, veryHillenius, "Lung Structure And Ventilation in Theropod
difficult to envisage, especially bearing in mind thatDinosaurs and Early Birds," Science, vol. 278, p. 1267.
the maintenance of respiratory function is absolutely(9) Michael J. Denton, Nature's Destiny, Free Press,
vital to the life of the organism. Moreover, the uniqueNew York, 1998, p. 361.
function and form of the avian lung necessitates a(10) Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A
number of additional unique adaptations during avianFacsimile of the First Edition, Harvard University Press,
development… because first, the avian lung is fixed1964, p. 189
rigidly to the body wall and cannot therefore expand(11) Barbara J. Stahl, Vertebrate History: Problems in
in volume and, second, because of the small diameterEvolution, Dover, 1985, pp. 349-350.
of the lung capillaries and the resulting high surface(12) A. H. Brush, "On the Origin of Feathers," Journal
tension of any liquid within them, the avian lungof Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, 1996, p.132.
cannot be inflated out of a collapsed state as(13) A. H. Brush, "On the Origin of Feathers," Journal
happens in all other vertebrates after birth. The airof Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, 1996, p.131.
capillaries are never collapsed as are the alveoli of(14) A. H. Brush, "On the Origin of Feathers," Journal
other vertebrate species; rather, as they grow intoof Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, 1996, p.133.
the lung tissue, the parabronchi are from the(15) A. H. Brush, "On the Origin of Feathers," Journal
beginning open tubes filled with either air or fluid. (9)of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 9, 1996, p.131.
In other words, the passages in birds' lungs are so(16) Alan Feduccia, "On Why Dinosaurs Lacked
narrow that the air sacs inside their lungs cannot fillFeathers," The Beginning of Birds, Eichstatt, West
with air and empty again, as with land-dwellingGermany: Jura Museum, 1985, p. 76.
creatures. If a bird lung ever completely deflated, the(17) Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds,
bird would never be able to re-inflate it, or would atYale University Press, 1999, p. 128
the very least have great difficulty in doing so. For(18) Ann Gibbons, "Plucking the Feathered Dinosaur,"
this reason, the air sacs situated all over the lungScience, vol. 278, no. 5341, 14 November 1997, pp.
enable a constant passage of air to pass through,1229 - 1230
thus protecting the lungs from deflating.(19) Ann Gibbons, "Plucking the Feathered Dinosaur",
Of course this system, which is completely differentScience, volume 278, Number 5341 Issue of 14 Nov
from the lungs of reptiles and other vertebrates, and1997, pp. 1229 - 1230
is based on the most complex design, cannot have(20) Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds,
come about with random mutations, stage by stage,Yale University Press, 1999, p. 130
as evolution maintains. Thus, as Denton also(21) Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds,
mentions, the avian lung is enough to answerYale University Press, 1999, p. 132
Darwin's challenge:(22) Ernst Mayr, Systematics and the Origin of
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organSpecies, Dove, New York, 1964, p. 296.
existed, which could not possibly have been formed